entry-level
AOC Q27G42XE vs LG UltraGear 24GS60F-B
Both sit in the same price bracket, so the question is not which is better but which suits you. Below are the real differences, then who each one is for.
The differences that matter
- Sharpness: the AOC Q27G42XE is QHD and the LG UltraGear 24GS60F-B is Full HD. On screen that is 109 against 92 pixels per inch, and it shows most in text.
- Panel type: Fast IPS on the AOC Q27G42XE and IPS on the LG UltraGear 24GS60F-B. This is the difference that changes most of what you see: it decides contrast and how much motion smears.
- Size: 27 inches against 23.8. At normal desk distance the larger one covers more field of view; the smaller one can be read whole without moving your eyes.
- Stand: the AOC Q27G42XE allows height, tilt, swivel and pivot and the LG UltraGear 24GS60F-B, tilt only. If you will be at the desk for hours, this matters more than it looks.
Which one suits you
Choose the AOC Q27G42XE if
- you want the most sharpness
- you need more ports or USB-C
- you will spend long hours at the desk
Specs side by side
| AOC Q27G42XE | LG UltraGear 24GS60F-B | |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 27" | 23.8" |
| Resolution | QHD 2560 × 1440 | Full HD 1920 × 1080 |
| Panel type | Fast IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Curvature | Flat | Flat |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Peak brightness | — | — |
| Adaptive sync | Adaptive-Sync | Adaptive-Sync |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi▲ | 92 ppi |
| Video ports | 1 × HDMI 2.0, 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 | — |
| USB-C with charging | — | — |
| Stand adjustments | Height, tilt, swivel and pivot | Tilt only |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Speakers | No | — |
| Warranty | 3 years | — |
Highlighted rows are where the two monitors differ. The ▲ mark points to the better value where one can be named objectively; on fields like panel type or size there is no «better», it depends on what you want.
Size, resolution, panel, refresh rate and response time are each checked against the manufacturer's listing on Amazon.es. Anything we could not confirm shows as “—”: we would rather leave a gap than invent a figure.