ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDMZ
A 31.5-inch QD-OLED panel at 4K and 240 Hz with a claimed 0.03 ms. It combines 4K sharpness at 140 pixels per inch with OLED's instant response.
4K, 240 Hz and QD-OLED across 32 inches: almost no compromises left.
Indicative price captured on 3 September 2026. Check it on Amazon before buying.
Specs verified on Amazon.es on 3 September 2026
Editor scores
Scores from 0 to 10, calculated by the same rule for all 18 monitors in the catalogue. These are not manufacturer figures. How we score.
- Smoothness9/10
- Image10/10
- Sharpness9/10
- Competitive8/10
- Connectivity7/10
- Ergonomics7/10
- Value7/10
Full specifications
| Size | 31.5" |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 4K UHD 3840 × 2160 |
| Panel type | QD-OLED |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Response time | 0.03 ms |
| Curvature | Flat |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| Peak brightness | — |
| Adaptive sync | Adaptive-Sync |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi |
| Video ports | — |
| USB-C with charging | — |
| Stand adjustments | — |
| VESA mount | — |
| Speakers | — |
| Warranty | — |
A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure or we could not verify it. We never fill gaps with estimates.
Size, resolution, panel, refresh rate and response time are each checked against the manufacturer's listing on Amazon.es. Anything we could not confirm shows as “—”: we would rather leave a gap than invent a figure.
The review
This monitor settles the classic high-end dilemma of choosing between resolution and speed. Here you get 4K and 240 Hz at once, so demanding games do not look soft and competitive ones do not feel slow.
Being QD-OLED, every pixel switches off completely. Contrast cannot be expressed with the usual figures because black is black, with no backlight leaking through, and quantum-dot colour is highly saturated without looking artificial. In motion, 0.03 ms makes the idea of smearing stop applying.
The trade-offs are those of the technology: sustained brightness in very bright scenes does not match a good Mini-LED, and retention is worth considering if you spend whole working days with fixed interfaces. At 32 inches, 4K gives about 140 pixels per inch, an excellent density that will probably want some system scaling for comfortable work.
In its favour
- 4K and 240 Hz without choosing
- Absolute black and QD-OLED colour
- 0.03 ms: instant response
- 140 ppi, outstanding sharpness
Against it
- High-end price
- Sustained brightness below a Mini-LED
- Fixed interfaces need care because of retention
Best for: Anyone who wants a single monitor that does everything at the highest level and has the card to drive it.
Check the price on Amazonfrom about €869What the reviews say
Ratings are very high and agree on the impact of the image and how well it combines resolution with speed. The most repeated criticism is the price and the care the panel demands.
Summary written from the ratings published on Amazon. The full, up-to-date reviews are on the product page.
Alternatives in the same tier
Alienware AW3225QF
31.6" · 4K · 240 Hz · Curved QD-OLED
The most rounded balance in the premium tier, and the cheapest of its group.
LG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
31.5" · 4K · 240 Hz · WOLED Tandem MLA+
480 Hz at the press of a button: the fastest monitor in this comparison.
MSI MPG 491CQP
49" · DQHD · 144 Hz · Curved QD-OLED
Two QHD monitors fused together, no bezel in the middle and an OLED panel.